The FIA’s report on the contentious conclusion to the 2021 world championship was a very long time coming.
It was made public 97 days after the ultimate race of final yr, and sooner or later earlier than the primary race of the brand new season. Whether or not or not this was by design, it left little time for reflection on its contents, which had been offered little over an hour earlier than the automobiles hit the monitor for the primary qualifying session of 2022.
Nevertheless the actual fact any report appeared in any respect was outstanding. The game’s governing physique had a robust incentive to downplay its response to the Abu Dhabi controversy, and within the fast aftermath of the race that gave the impression to be the path it could take.
In asserting its response the FIA conceded solely that the dealing with of the disputed Abu Dhabi Grand Prix “generated important misunderstanding and reactions from Components 1 groups, drivers and followers”, which appeared to depart no room for an admission one thing had gone badly improper. In response it promised an “evaluation and clarification train”.
However, to the FIA’s credit score, the tip product was not as toothless as this euphemistically-worded pitch might have led readers to anticipate.
Curiosity in its findings was naturally excessive. F1 boasted 107 million folks watched final yr’s season finale however what they noticed mirrored poorly on the administration of the world championship.
Lewis Hamilton was on target to overtake Max Verstappen’s championship lead till the disputed ultimate lap restart following which his rival handed him to win. Race director Michael Masi’s sudden choice to deviate from previous apply, made whereas being lobbied by each groups, provoked incomprehension at first adopted by fury because it swung the end result of the world championship.
Three months later the FIA delivered its verdict on Masi’s dealing with of the race. The end result turned out to be much less a “clarification” of a “misunderstanding”, extra an evidence of what went improper and the way it intends to stop a repeat.
Advert | Turn out to be a RaceFans supporter and
The clearest measure of the seriousness of a mistake is whether or not the one that dedicated it’s allowed to stay in the identical place of accountability. Lengthy earlier than the FIA’s report emerged it was made identified this wouldn’t occur, and that Masi would get replaced within the function.
The report is lengthy on the reasons for the stress Masi discovered himself underneath on the time and quick on the small print of the errors made. Certainly, the FIA World Motor Sport Council’s assertion which accompanied the report states what went improper way more plainly, noting: “The race director referred to as the security automobile again into the pit lane with out it having accomplished a further lap as required by the Components 1 Sporting Rules.”
On Masi’s disputed choice to solely enable the lapped automobiles between Hamilton and Verstappen to rejoin the lead lap, it provides: “human error result in the truth that not all automobiles had been allowed to un-lap themselves.” Notice the phrase “human error” doesn’t happen inside the report itself.
The report incorporates many paragraphs describing the stress Masi was underneath, all of which is little question legitimate. However there’s additionally a component of round reasoning right here: The time stress was a partly self-inflicted consequence of the choice to deliver the Security Automobile in a lap sooner than the laws specified. Adhering to the foundations turned a secondary consideration to restarting the race for the good thing about ‘the present’.
On account of the report the FIA has a brand new, three-person race path workforce geared up with a brand new Distant Operations Centre. This can hopefully show greater than enough to stop future race administrators deciding on a whim to implement new interpretations of important guidelines within the dying laps of world championship-deciding races (or some other time).
However what if it isn’t? What if a future race director makes another error which decides a pole place, a race victory or, as on this case, a world championship?
Talking in February, weeks earlier than the FIA introduced the findings of its “evaluation and clarification train”, McLaren workforce principal Andreas Seidl made the clever statement that they wanted to do extra than simply determine what went improper in a single occasion and tackle it for the long run.
“We have to settle for errors can occur, on the workforce’s aspect but additionally on the FIA’s aspect,” mentioned Seidl.
Advert | Turn out to be a RaceFans supporter and
“For me it’s crucial as nicely that we additionally talk about a racing mechanism the place you could have, let’s say that we’re ready that if errors occur, the place do you have to increase your hand and admit them and have a mechanism in place in an effort to appropriate these errors additionally, or appropriate the results that such errors or controversies may have.
“That’s as vital as attempting to keep away from related controversies within the first place.”
Mercedes ultimately backed down from interesting in opposition to the race consequence as a result of it realised that even when they had been profitable, the end result can be the cancellation of the Abu Dhabi race consequence, which might not alter Hamilton’s championship defeat.
No mechanism existed with the FIA’s guidelines to revive his misplaced title. Laps have been retroactively deleted from race outcomes attributable to errors with the chequered flag, however the guidelines don’t enable for a similar to happen when the race director has made a mistake.
Nevertheless Mercedes workforce principal Toto Wolff was keener to reward the progress the FIA has made, underneath new president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, by being open over its findings, when not everybody needed the report back to be revealed. “We have to see the step change that has been made by releasing the report line-by-line,” mentioned Wolff in response to a query from RaceFans.
“I’m glad that there’s extra transparency. I do know from my conversations with Mohammed that he’s very resolute in placing in a system that’s vulnerable to much less errors. There’s good folks, there can be a digital race room between the FIA places of work and I believe that is what counts.
“Dwelling about Abu Dhabi doesn’t make my or our life simpler in any respect. It’s occurred, the trophy is in any individual else’s cupboard, and that’s it. Chapter closed. And I believe the FIA can have discovered how issues shouldn’t be dealt with.”
No matter your opinion of how the Abu Dhabi row was dealt with, the need to maneuver on from it’s certainly universally shared at this level. But it surely’s in one of the best pursuits of all involved to not proceed too unexpectedly, earlier than all classes have been discovered.
In any other case the following workforce to be wronged might have fewer trophies of their cupboard than Mercedes, and be much less keen to take a misplaced championship on the chin in fairly the identical approach.
2022 F1 season
Browse all 2022 F1 season articles