Canadians who pay their cellphone invoice with a bank card may quickly see an additional payment each month, if Canada’s telecom regulator approves a proposal at present earlier than them.
Telecom firm Telus is asking the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Fee (CRTC) for permission so as to add a 1.5 per cent surcharge to the payments of shoppers who pay their invoice utilizing a bank card. If authorised, it might be in place beginning as quickly as October.
For a theoretical buyer in Alberta whose cellphone invoice is $100, the cost would carry their invoice to $106.66 — $100 for his or her fundamental invoice, plus $5 for GST, a $1.58 surcharge for the brand new payment on high of that, plus one other eight cents in GST on the surcharge.
“The corporate plans to offer advance notices of the payment to its present clients beginning in mid-August,” Telus mentioned in its letter to the regulator.
Payment might be in place by October
The corporate is asking the regulator to determine on the proposal by Sept. 7 and wish to begin levying the brand new cost as of Oct. 17, and whereas the CRTC should rule on the matter, in an announcement to CBC Information the telecom firm made the plan sound like a carried out deal.
“Beginning in October, Telus mobility and residential providers clients selecting to make a invoice fee with a bank card can be charged a 1.5 per cent bank card processing payment,” Telus instructed CBC Information in an announcement.
The corporate additionally mentioned within the assertion that quite a few different important providers already cost a payment to pay with bank cards, together with the Canada Income Company, the Metropolis of Toronto, and electrical and fuel suppliers similar to Enbridge, Epcor, B.C. Hydro, FortisBC and Alectra.
“This payment helps us recuperate a portion of the processing prices we incur to simply accept bank card funds, and the typical price can be round $2 for many clients,” the corporate mentioned, noting that it could actually simply be prevented by paying via a financial institution, by way of a debit transaction, or different means.
Though the corporate didn’t present a precise breakdown, Telus says most of its clients at present pay by way of a technique that might not accrue the payment.
Telus’s low cost flanker manufacturers together with Koodo and Public Cellular won’t be topic to the payment, nor will clients in Quebec.
WATCH | Why Canadians pay extra for telecom providers than many different international locations:
Telus’ rationale for the transfer stems from a growth this summer season, when bank card corporations together with Visa and MasterCard agreed to a settlement that may see them refund thousands and thousands of {dollars} price of bank card processing charges that retailers have paid them through the years. Crucially, that settlement additionally provides companies permission to start out charging clients these charges instantly beginning in October, which is what Telus is attempting to do.
Beforehand, many retailers weren’t allowed to cost clients instantly for the charges that credit score firms cost them for processing gross sales. Such charges can vary from lower than one per cent of the sale, to greater than three per cent for some premium playing cards.
As a result of nearly each a part of its enterprise is regulated by the CRTC, Telus wants the regulator to start out charging charges that customers can count on to start out seeing from quite a lot of retailers quickly.
CBC Information reached out to Rogers and Bell to see if they’ve any related plans within the works, however representatives of each firms didn’t reply to that request inside one enterprise day.
Some clients aren’t joyful
Some wi-fi clients aren’t enthused by the concept. Kenneth Hart of Windsor, Ont., a Telus buyer for 15 years, calls the plan “a cash seize.”
“It is a unhealthy enterprise transfer,” he instructed CBC Information in an interview. “They’ve some accountants telling them that is good. However then you definately discuss in regards to the PR prices, the reputational price, and it may create … dissatisfaction for these clients who’re already … not happy.”
“This might be the straw that broke the camel’s again.”
Telus solely filed the appliance on Monday, and the CRTC has already heard from greater than 200 Canadians by way of its web site, a lot of that are against the plan.
Steve Struthers is one in every of them. The resident of London, Ont., shouldn’t be a Telus buyer however he took the time to offer his two cents to the regulator due to how opposed he’s to the plan.
“Shoppers are already extraordinarily burdened with unaffordable housing, elevated meals costs, costly gasoline costs and wages that aren’t maintaining with any of this,” he instructed CBC Information in an interview.
“I am fairly sure they might afford to soak up a 1.5 per cent bank card payment … It bothers me figuring out the cellphone firms aren’t proud of the cash they’re making and so they nonetheless need extra in an setting the place individuals are reaching their restrict as to what they’ll pay.”
‘The very last thing anybody wants is an extra payment’
Rosa Addario, a spokesperson for telecom watchdog OpenMedia, says the plan is simply the most recent manner for the trade to extract extra income from cash-strapped Canadian customers.
“All three of our telecom suppliers … have reported elevated income, elevated income and elevated clients for 2021,” she instructed CBC Information in an interview. “They’re doing higher than ever. That is simply one other method to increase our payments via shady practices and further charges and including issues on high in order that we’re paying much more than we already are.”
Suze Morrison, a former Ontario MPP, is urging the CRTC to reject the proposal, noting that it’ll disproportionately impression people who find themselves already financially weak.
“Working class individuals, low earnings individuals are actually struggling to make ends meet proper now,” she instructed CBC Information in an interview. “The very last thing anybody wants is an extra payment simply due to how they pay their phone invoice to maintain their telephone traces linked.”
WATCH | Canada has 3 main telecom suppliers. Might that change?
Whereas bank card surcharges are creeping into many companies, she says it is totally different for a telecom utility to cost them as a result of it’s a necessity.
“A shopper has a option to go to a mother and pop restaurant or to prepare dinner dinner at house or to go to a restaurant that is not charging charges for bank card swipes,” she mentioned.
“However we have allowed a lot consolidation in our telecom trade and there is such a monopoly in the sector that it is not like people can say, ‘OK, effectively, if you are going to cost a payment, I will take my enterprise someplace else.’ I’ve nowhere else to go.”